The comments offer more insight than the writer who takes writes form the perspective of many lawyers. That parents/ consumers are "sour grapes" and that the divorce industry, GALs and judges are being bashed - we just don't understand as parents/ consumers......
The Connecticut Law Tribune
If what I saw the other day at the Rules Committee hearing on proposed Practice Book changes is any indication, the Judicial Branch (and all of us) are in for a rough year ahead.
For those who have never attended a Rules Committee hearing, it is commonly believed that things are pretty well set by the time they get to hearing stage and, absent some major upset or error, what has been proposed will be recommended to the judges for adoption after a pro forma airing. That was not to be the case this time, however.
I knew something was up when I uncharacteristically arrived a half-hour early and found a line of folks signing up to testify stretching out of the Supreme Court courtroom into the foyer. One of them was clearly their manager, as he walked back and forth giving advice on how to sign up anonymously and how some folks might want to pool their time to make a longer argument. I rightly guessed that this bunch were from the anti-GAL/AMC crowd, but I had no idea what was to follow.
Full story: The Connecticut Law Tribune
If you are interested in bringing about Family Court reform please contact us at NationalGALalert@gmail.com or find us on Facebook.
Thursday, May 29, 2014
Monday, May 19, 2014
Connecticut - 'Astronomical' Fees Assessed To Lawyer Who Testified For GAL Reform
The Connecticut Law Tribune
A Connecticut lawyer who publicly voiced his concerns about high costs of guardians ad litem services was shocked by the timing of an Appellate Court decision in his own divorce case.
Just one business day after Gov. Dannel Malloy signed into law a measure that will provide greater oversight of GALs and their fees, the court approved $252,000 in fees for two court-appointed child advocates. Some pro se parents who lobbied for GAL reform said they had been devastated financially by bills that were only a fraction as large.
The appeal was filed by Paul Greenan, a former Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom trusts and estates lawyer who now has a practice in Stamford. He claimed in court documents that the GAL and attorney for minor children appointed in his divorce case collectively spent just four-and-a-half hours with his two children, though that total was in dispute.
Full story: The Connecticut Law Tribune
A Connecticut lawyer who publicly voiced his concerns about high costs of guardians ad litem services was shocked by the timing of an Appellate Court decision in his own divorce case.
Just one business day after Gov. Dannel Malloy signed into law a measure that will provide greater oversight of GALs and their fees, the court approved $252,000 in fees for two court-appointed child advocates. Some pro se parents who lobbied for GAL reform said they had been devastated financially by bills that were only a fraction as large.
The appeal was filed by Paul Greenan, a former Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom trusts and estates lawyer who now has a practice in Stamford. He claimed in court documents that the GAL and attorney for minor children appointed in his divorce case collectively spent just four-and-a-half hours with his two children, though that total was in dispute.
Full story: The Connecticut Law Tribune
Tuesday, May 6, 2014
Maine - An appeal to Maine's Supreme Court: Dalton Vs. Dalton CUM-13-521 - the Lawyers Debate
We welcome this
chance to publish the final two steps in an appeal to Maine's Supreme Court,
the Dalton vs Dalton case. Step II, which follows here, is attorney Susan
Bixby's reply to Beth Maloney's original brief.
Maloney’s brief, published here earlier, got the appeal process started.
Step III is Maloney’s rebuttal of Bixby.
Along with our
presentation here of the final two steps, we offer our layman’s observations
and reactions to the 'arcana' of legal strategy used by these lawyers for a
family court appeal. Our non-expert,
"grass roots" response to both pieces of writing is philosophical and
common sense - not legal. The
philosophical flaws we see in both documents are about the basic human
assumptions, the investigative process and the judicial decisions behind
the classic lawyerly strategies for how
the "contentious divorce” (and its appeal) gets played. For what it's worth, here is our personal
take on the final two lawyerly exchanges in the Dalton v Dalton debate:
II.) SUSAN BIXBY'S
APPROACH:
As we read it, Ms
Bixby uses an all too common divorce strategy: to communicate by strong inference that suburban housewife and mother
of three children, Sarah Dalton, is a dangerous woman around children. You may note that Bixby carefully comes close
to the line of actually charging child abuse, but doesn't ever cross it.
In her well designed response to the Maloney brief, Bixby strongly hints
that, if Ms Dalton were left alone with her kids, God alone knows what bad -
but unspecified - things might happen.
In tone it is all very subjunctive, speculative and scary. She never crosses the line dividing hints of
possible abuse from actual charges of abuse - for good reason. It would end the family court hearings and -
after investigation, might place the charge in criminal court, where a trial by
jury would probably clear Ms Dalton of the "hints" of abuse issue.
Clearly, Ms Bixby's
client , Mr. Dalton, is indirectly represented as wanting an “exclusive” - all
of his children all of the time. No sharing. No concern about the children's
need for a maternal parent. It is a hardball, legalistic "abuse game"
right out of the movie, "Divorce
Corp". Take no prisoners! The Bixby presentation raises the question
in this reader's mind: "What exactly makes Ms Dalton 'unfit' as a mother ,
and after all of these years as a mother is she suddenly ‘nouveau’
abusive?" And, another puzzle, why
is she presented as, so far, being
immune to corrective therapy? It
is so stereotyped a legal strategy of demonizing a custody opponent as almost
to be out of the tabloids!
Bixby, by her
numerous claims that Maloney has ignored the "Rules
of Evidence" more than implies that her legal opponent is dim and
ignorant of how to use the "Rules of Evidence". Tut tut!
As non-lawyers, what can we say?
The always meticulous, compulsive, detail-oriented Maloney, it is
implied, needs to go back to the "Rules" book and bone up! There is also an unmistakable hint from Bixby
that Maloney needs lessons in legal etiquette and propriety. "Aggressive
lawyering" is the operant phrase but there is more innuendo of absent
professional refinement.
But read Part II,
the Bixby reply and see what you think: Dalton
Vs. Dalton CUM-13-521 Bixby's response.
To read the initial
brief that was filed in February 2014 please follow this link: An appeal to
Maine's Supreme Court: DaltonVs. Dalton CUM-13-521.
If you have had
problems in Family Court with a judge or Guardian ad litem please contact us at
NationalGALalert@gmail.com of find us on Facebook.
Friday, May 2, 2014
Georgia - Columbia County judge resigns over misconduct allegations
The Augusta Chronicle
A Columbia County magistrate judge resigned his office Thursday amid allegations that he had behaved inappropriately toward women he had encountered as a guardian ad litem, officials said.
Doug Nelson, who had been a magistrate judge since 2007, submitted his resignation at the Evans courthouse, said Columbia County Chief Magistrate Judge Jason Troiano. It was effective immediately, Troiano said.
Nelson had been notified earlier Thursday that Troiano had taken him off the court calendar and intended to refer him to the Georgia Judicial Qualifications Commission.
“While it is inappropriate to comment on the matter, I take the allegations very seriously,” Troiano said in a statement. “The integrity of Columbia County Magistrate Court and the judicial process are of utmost concern.”
At least two women have accused Nelson of inappropriate remarks and touching while serving as a court-appointed guardian ad litem in their divorce cases, court officials said.
Full story: The Augusta Chronicle
A Columbia County magistrate judge resigned his office Thursday amid allegations that he had behaved inappropriately toward women he had encountered as a guardian ad litem, officials said.
Doug Nelson, who had been a magistrate judge since 2007, submitted his resignation at the Evans courthouse, said Columbia County Chief Magistrate Judge Jason Troiano. It was effective immediately, Troiano said.
Nelson had been notified earlier Thursday that Troiano had taken him off the court calendar and intended to refer him to the Georgia Judicial Qualifications Commission.
“While it is inappropriate to comment on the matter, I take the allegations very seriously,” Troiano said in a statement. “The integrity of Columbia County Magistrate Court and the judicial process are of utmost concern.”
At least two women have accused Nelson of inappropriate remarks and touching while serving as a court-appointed guardian ad litem in their divorce cases, court officials said.
Full story: The Augusta Chronicle
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)